Skip to Content

VAT Fines Are Coming for You: Supreme Court Says 'I Didn’t Know' No Longer Counts

Dutch entrepreneurs slapped with double penalties, ignorance now equals gross negligence.
July 28, 2025 by
VAT Fines Are Coming for You: Supreme Court Says 'I Didn’t Know' No Longer Counts
Linda Pavan

When Ignorance Is Not an Excuse: The Supreme Court Has Spoken

Let’s not sugarcoat it. On July 18, 2025, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands confirmed, loud and clear, that not knowing how VAT rules apply to your business can now cost you double in penalties, especially if the Tax Authority considers your behavior "grossly negligent."

And if you're an entrepreneur running a micro or small business, real estate or not, this is more than a distant legal story. It's a wake-up call.

Let’s break it down. Clearly. Structurally. And practically, just like I would explain it to a client across the table at the end of a long day.

The Case: A Real Estate Operator, VAT, and Two Fines

A company (let’s call her [X] NV) rented out real estate. Some of her activities were exempt from VAT, others weren’t. She made the mistake of deducting input VAT on costs that were only related to her exempt rentals.

Here’s the key mistake: if your revenue is VAT-exempt, you don’t get to reclaim the VAT you pay on your expenses for that activity. Period.

The Tax Inspector audited her 2015–2016 returns and hit her with:

  • An Article 67f fine: for deducting VAT she wasn't entitled to.
  • An Article 10a fine: for failing to file corrections before the audit uncovered the issue.

Both penalties were set at 25% of the wrongly deducted VAT. Yes, each. So, double whammy.

The Legal Battle: “But I Didn’t Know!”

The business owner appealed. She claimed the fines were unfair, that she didn’t know she was making a mistake, and that the Tax Inspector had only assumed she was grossly negligent.

What did the Supreme Court say?

Gross negligence does not require intent. It is enough that a business owner should have known better, especially when they have experience in the sector.

Translation? "I didn’t know" is no longer good enough when your role requires that you should have known.

Why This Matters to You, the Small Business Owner

You may not be a real estate mogul. But the precedent affects all VAT-registered entrepreneurs who:

  • Mix VAT-exempt and VAT-taxed activities
  • Deduct VAT on costs without checking attribution
  • Fail to submit supplementary declarations when mistakes are discovered

Even microbusinesses will be judged against what is "reasonable to expect", not what they personally understood.

And no, the court didn’t say you have to be a tax expert. But you do have to:

  • Set up a compliant administration
  • Understand the basics of deductible vs. non-deductible VAT
  • Act promptly if errors are discovered

Because not acting is no longer just an oversight, it’s liable negligence.

What Counts as “Gross Negligence”?

Based on the Supreme Court's reaffirmed stance:

  • You can be penalized without malicious intent.
  • If you're experienced, you are held to a higher standard.
  • Mistakes are not forgiven just because you didn’t get caught right away.
  • If you had time to correct an error and didn’t? You’re considered grossly negligent.

What You Need to Do Now

Let me be practical, because that’s how we work at Xtroverso.

  1. Audit your VAT structure.
    Are you mixing exempt and taxable services? Make sure you’ve got clean attribution of costs.
  2. Recheck past deductions.
    Did you reclaim VAT on costs that apply only to exempt revenue? If so, file a supplement, before the Tax Authority finds it.
  3. Document your logic.
    Keep written records of why you deducted what you did. If challenged, you need to show clear reasoning, not confusion.
  4. Get professional advice.
    Don’t assume your bookkeeper is on top of this. Ask specifically about exempt activities, supplements, and attribution.
  5. Don’t wait to correct.
    The court made it clear: time to correct = time to avoid a fine. Use it.

Final Word: Compliance Is Not Optional, It’s Entrepreneurial Self-Defense

If this ruling makes you uncomfortable, good. It should. Because it confirms what I say to clients every month:

Your administration isn’t a formality. It’s your shield.

The Supreme Court just raised the bar. Don’t wait for a tax inspector to remind you. As entrepreneurs, we fight for every euro we earn, so let’s not lose it to preventable fines.

When in doubt? Ask. Double-check. Document. And never assume you're “too small” to matter.

AUTHOR : Linda Pavan

Co-Founder of Xtroverso | Head of Ledger and Tax Compliance

Linda Pavan brings disciplined precision to Xtroverso, anchoring its financial, fiscal, and operational integrity. As a ZENTRIQ™ Certified Auditor, she translates complexity into clarity, ensuring every decision is traceable, compliant, and strategically sound. Her quiet rigor empowers businesses to act with confidence and accountability.

Linda Pavan | Head of Tax , Certified Zentriq Auditor

VAT Fines Are Coming for You: Supreme Court Says 'I Didn’t Know' No Longer Counts
Linda Pavan July 28, 2025
Share this post